Of course do I use the tab-key to autocomplete, so the issue is not a typo.gapan wrote:Ah, it's SlackBuild, not Slackbuild... Learn to use the tab key to avoid such errors.
Search found 89 matches
- 26. Jan 2015, 10:22
- Forum: General
- Topic: Should I login as root while creating packages?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11461
Re: Should I login as root while creating packages?
- 25. Jan 2015, 20:55
- Forum: General
- Topic: Should I login as root while creating packages?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11461
Re: Should I login as root while creating packages?
It isn't on the $PATH, but adding "./" as you suggested brought up the same error message.
- 25. Jan 2015, 19:18
- Forum: General
- Topic: Should I login as root while creating packages?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11461
Re: Should I login as root while creating packages?
It is:
Code: Select all
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jjbj users 4863 Jan 25 14:52 git.SlackBuild
- 25. Jan 2015, 13:02
- Forum: General
- Topic: Should I login as root while creating packages?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 11461
Re: Should I login as root while creating packages?
I have tried to build a newer git using Pat's slackBuild from here , but when I run it as recommended: fakeroot git.Slackbuild 2>&1 | tee git-1.9.0-build.log I get the following error: /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 178: git.Slackbuild: command not found What am I doing wrong? Note that I have also use...
- 20. Jan 2015, 08:44
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: [SOLVED] [14.1 MATE] Icon for Qt4 Config?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3757
Re: [14.1 MATE] Icon for Qt4 Config?
Thanks for the tip! I got the icon from here, and placed it in /usr/share/pixmaps/ as you suggested.
Things fixed now!
Edit: added screenshot
Things fixed now!
Edit: added screenshot
- 19. Jan 2015, 16:22
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: [SOLVED] [14.1 MATE] Icon for Qt4 Config?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3757
- 18. Jan 2015, 20:09
- Forum: General
- Topic: [SOLVED] Oracle Java JDK repackage: which slackBuild?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7611
Re: Oracle Java JDK repackage: which slackBuild?
That did the trick - thanks a lot!
- 18. Jan 2015, 18:51
- Forum: General
- Topic: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple PCs
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4073
Re: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple
I don't mind the somewhat slower build-process - the build-PC is quite fast and I can let it do its job in the background while working on other things
- 18. Jan 2015, 18:45
- Forum: General
- Topic: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple PCs
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4073
Re: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple
Thanks also for pointing me to the very informative post on the mailing list! This setup seems somewhat "scary" to me (as I am not that experienced with building environments), so I would consider preparing all the packages in a VirtualBox VM.
Would this be a good option?
Would this be a good option?
- 18. Jan 2015, 18:42
- Forum: General
- Topic: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple PCs
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4073
Re: Optimal setup for cross-compiling packages for multiple
Resulting packages will always have different md5sums, as file creation times are stored inside the package and those differ every single time. I had the same thought, but as I had one package with exactly the same md5sum built on both machines while the another wasn't identical, I thought that I p...