Yes, you are right it's better to let the choice up to each user. But it is a very disappointing experience to find the flash doesn't work if there is no obvious reason while for some other users it works with no clue why :shock:
It is definitely good to have this described on the wiki (I just ...
Search found 13 matches
- 29. Oct 2013, 16:14
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: flash-plugin needs mozilla-nss
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7125
- 29. Oct 2013, 10:41
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: flash-plugin needs mozilla-nss
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7125
Re: flash-plugin needs mozilla-nss
Hm, hm, ... how about writing a note about it in the packages' description?
I mean sth like:
If you want to see flash videos in the browser, you need 'flash-plugin' and also one of 'mozilla-nss' or seamonkey'-solibs' or 'seamonkey' to include all the necessary libraries.
and put it into the ...
I mean sth like:
If you want to see flash videos in the browser, you need 'flash-plugin' and also one of 'mozilla-nss' or seamonkey'-solibs' or 'seamonkey' to include all the necessary libraries.
and put it into the ...
- 28. Oct 2013, 22:18
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: flash-plugin needs mozilla-nss
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7125
flash-plugin needs mozilla-nss
I've found (at last!) why flash doesn't work in midori or opera. It's because the flash-plugin package ought to have mozilla-nss as a dependency.
After installing it, youtube seems to work in either browser.
After installing it, youtube seems to work in either browser.
- 21. Feb 2012, 11:21
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: xdvi needs libXm.so.2 from lesstif
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2267
xdvi needs libXm.so.2 from lesstif
Hi,
we have just found a missing dep for xdvi (on amd64) - it needs libXm.so.2 from lesstif.
Can someone, please, fix it?
Thank you
we have just found a missing dep for xdvi (on amd64) - it needs libXm.so.2 from lesstif.
Can someone, please, fix it?
Thank you
- 30. Dec 2011, 19:19
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: priority for manually installed packages
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8470
Re: priority for manually installed packages
Hm, thank you again for your views.
Yes, it is mainly the customization of a package that makes rebuilding packages necessary. But in my situation, it is just the fact that the official lapack package has a bug (missing soft links to liblapack.so ...) and other sw depending on it fails to build ...
Yes, it is mainly the customization of a package that makes rebuilding packages necessary. But in my situation, it is just the fact that the official lapack package has a bug (missing soft links to liblapack.so ...) and other sw depending on it fails to build ...
- 19. Dec 2011, 10:19
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: priority for manually installed packages
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8470
Re: priority for manually installed packages
I thank you very much for your responses, but it seems I am perhaps the only one who uses slapt-src . No one else has similar problems?
Well, for now the extra local repo is the only practical way (or also the exclude list) how to deal with local and slapt-src packages. In my view it delegates too ...
Well, for now the extra local repo is the only practical way (or also the exclude list) how to deal with local and slapt-src packages. In my view it delegates too ...
- 18. Dec 2011, 13:50
- Forum: Suggestions
- Topic: priority for manually installed packages
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8470
priority for manually installed packages
Hello,
If I make a local package and install it either by spkg or installpkg or use a pkg from SlackBuilds (even by slapt-src ),
AND
the package is already available in a slapt-get repo , whenever I use slapt-get --upgrade , the package is about to be replaced (i.e. downgraded) by the version ...
If I make a local package and install it either by spkg or installpkg or use a pkg from SlackBuilds (even by slapt-src ),
AND
the package is already available in a slapt-get repo , whenever I use slapt-get --upgrade , the package is about to be replaced (i.e. downgraded) by the version ...
- 10. Dec 2011, 13:34
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: gnumeric depends on goffice
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2350
gnumeric depends on goffice
Hi,
just installed gnumeric, but it needs libgoffice-0.8.so.8 from goffice package (which was not installed automatically). Could you please fix the dependence info in the repo?
Thanks,
JS
just installed gnumeric, but it needs libgoffice-0.8.so.8 from goffice package (which was not installed automatically). Could you please fix the dependence info in the repo?
Thanks,
JS
- 9. Dec 2011, 16:52
- Forum: Other distributions
- Topic: Bsd os
- Replies: 16
- Views: 20806
Re: Bsd os
I also tried NetBSD, version 5.0.1. It installed like a charm and it's really fast (well, I use only OpenBox + tint2 on it). I like it very much, but it has a lot of problems with the pre-compiled packages: too many of them have conflicts not easily solved (Linux world is simpler, in this), and ...
- 24. Sep 2011, 20:42
- Forum: General
- Topic: how to make local packages preferred?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4581
Re: how to make local packages preferred?
Yes, creating a local repo with such packages sounds promising. But, please, how to do that?
If I just create e.g. /usr/local/packages and put all my packages there, it obviously won't work. slapt-get needs something more in there. What should I do?
Thanks,
JS
If I just create e.g. /usr/local/packages and put all my packages there, it obviously won't work. slapt-get needs something more in there. What should I do?
Thanks,
JS