yep!
dependencies without package version are not my fault!
it should be reported to the packager manteiner,
ill'find a way to do that ...

i486 was an old proc released around 1990 from x86 family.
depends from what arch is used to built the package,
i think is better talk with Salix packager, about repository name maybe is more correct to put x86 than i486

@ JRD
thx, your suggestions are now online.
for x86 you can see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86

@thenktor
about what?

Salix packages are now indexed by the Package Search Engine, available features are:
- cross referencing for package dependencies
- check for package update [new]

please report any bug and help me to popularize the project.

if you are interested you can check my new project
www slackabduction com ...

ok, i think this is the news i was waiting for.

Hi people,
i'm the developer of Slakware Package SE / Tracker, sorry for the intrusion but i found this discussion searching on google.
first of all i'm very happy to know someone interested on my project outside main lines,
i know salix since was born ...

before to start including salix repo i ...