Salix will be married with slackware
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
I fall everytime, I remember reading on some news site a few years ago, that Red Hat was bought by Microsoft, i was worried and suprised all day long, until i told someone and I received this look.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 3. Dec 2010, 10:24
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
The best April Fools' Day story for me this year was the 'Gnome 4 review':
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120402
It's now listed as humour, but it wasn't on the day. The all-time winner for me was this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ugSKW4-QQ
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120402
It's now listed as humour, but it wasn't on the day. The all-time winner for me was this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ugSKW4-QQ
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
DavidMcCann wrote:The all-time winner for me was this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ugSKW4-QQ
Reminds me of someone that once asked me "how are raisins made?". The answer was naturally "Raisin trees of course, didn't you know?"
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
You guys totally got me....
almost two months later. DAMN! Was just reading through to see if I missed anything and all of a sudden I find this *very important news*. Jesus Christ, guys. Thanks for the heart attack.
Dennis in New Orleans
almost two months later. DAMN! Was just reading through to see if I missed anything and all of a sudden I find this *very important news*. Jesus Christ, guys. Thanks for the heart attack.
Dennis in New Orleans
There are no stupid questions.
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
Slackware 14 reachs beta... It's going to be 14 or 15??? http://www.slackware.com/changelog/current.php?cpu=i386
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
It will be 666
Re: Salix will be married with slackware
I think 14 is a good number. It's an important age in many legislations linked to several rights/duties like being able to sign a contract. So how to better show the maturity of Slackware.
Apart from that I think 14.13 would be nice to show that there is no need to evade the number 13 by using it yet again instead of omitting it alltogether as sometimes seen in buildings.
Apart from that I think 14.13 would be nice to show that there is no need to evade the number 13 by using it yet again instead of omitting it alltogether as sometimes seen in buildings.