For a starting point, here are
- psi-l10n (Translations for PSI)
- psi (x86_64, version 0.14)
- libdaemon (x86_64, version 0.13) - needed for avahi
- avahi (x86_64, version 0.6.25) - without qt[3|4] and mono support
If there is some interest in an avahi package with qt and/or mono support as well, i can build separate packages.
http://people.salixos.org/damnagehack/
[done] Psi localization and avahi / libdaemon
- damNageHack
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 17:07
[done] Psi localization and avahi / libdaemon
Last edited by damNageHack on 2. Jan 2010, 17:27, edited 2 times in total.
This is the oppinion of the author, it does not force you to share and is signed automatically.
You are free to keep them all errors for your own. Linux is the best game I ever played.
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
Psi and it's l10n package are fine. But what happened to LIBDIRSUFFIX?
Even if there are no libs in the package it should be in the SLKBUILD
Would you please maintain the i486 package, too?
Code: Select all
./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} || return 1
Would you please maintain the i486 package, too?
- damNageHack
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 17:07
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
I just got your SLKBUILDthenktor wrote:Psi and it's l10n package are fine. But what happened to LIBDIRSUFFIX?Even if there are no libs in the package it should be in the SLKBUILDCode: Select all
./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX} || return 1
Let's see how fast a new psi version will come. But yes, it makes no sense to have two maintainers which depend on the architecture.thenktor wrote:Would you please maintain the i486 package, too?
This is the oppinion of the author, it does not force you to share and is signed automatically.
You are free to keep them all errors for your own. Linux is the best game I ever played.
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
Hihi, i had it in the SLKBUILD on my hard disk, but probably not in the one you got
- damNageHack
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 17:07
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
Avahi updated to support also qt4 .. http://salixos.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... 2654#p2654
This is the oppinion of the author, it does not force you to share and is signed automatically.
You are free to keep them all errors for your own. Linux is the best game I ever played.
- damNageHack
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 17:07
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
So how should we proceed with avahi? I would like to see both packages avahi and libdaemon (needed dep for avahi) in the salix repos sometimes ...damNageHack wrote:Avahi updated to support also qt4 .. http://salixos.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... 2654#p2654
This is the oppinion of the author, it does not force you to share and is signed automatically.
You are free to keep them all errors for your own. Linux is the best game I ever played.
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
Submit it in the bugtracker then.damNageHack wrote:So how should we proceed with avahi? I would like to see both packages avahi and libdaemon (needed dep for avahi) in the salix repos sometimes ...
- damNageHack
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 17:07
Re: Some packages to test (beta)
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/salix/ticket/152gapan wrote: Submit it in the bugtracker then.
This is the oppinion of the author, it does not force you to share and is signed automatically.
You are free to keep them all errors for your own. Linux is the best game I ever played.