lxml and stalonetray

General talk about packaging procedures and packages.
Post Reply
User avatar
mimosa
Salix Warrior
Posts: 3101
Joined: 25. May 2010, 17:02
Contact:

lxml and stalonetray

Post by mimosa » 29. Aug 2012, 13:34

As suggested in the chatroom, this is to say that I'm working on these two packages. Not that they're very complicated, but there are a few things to doublecheck.

I can't package for 64 bits at the moment, but I'm expecting to take delivery of a 64-bit motherboard on Friday or early next week, so soon I will be able to :)
Last edited by mimosa on 16. Sep 2012, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fredg
Posts: 232
Joined: 3. Oct 2009, 16:50
Location: Lyon, France
Contact:

Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray

Post by fredg » 29. Aug 2012, 15:27

Yes, good idea.

I have added the [WIP] tag (Work In Progress) for a better visualization, just remove it when it's done ;)

++

User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 5531
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray

Post by gapan » 30. Aug 2012, 07:32

Uhm...
Mon Jul 30 2012
l/python-lxml-2.3.4-i486-1gv.txz: Added.
This is an upgrade to the lxml package in 13.37.
Image
Image

User avatar
mimosa
Salix Warrior
Posts: 3101
Joined: 25. May 2010, 17:02
Contact:

Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray

Post by mimosa » 30. Aug 2012, 08:59

Oh dear. This is a problem with names:

Code: Select all

vanilla[bin]$ ./pkgdepcheck.py
Please enter name of package:    lxml
The package  lxml is present in stable but has not been packaged for current yet.

Its dependencies are
libgcrypt libgpg-error libxml2 libxslt python zlib
We will now check whether any of these deps remain unpackaged in current.
The following packages are missing:
lxml
Please enter name of package:    python-lxml
The package  python-lxml has already been packaged for current.
... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current? This is slapt-get in 13.37:

Code: Select all

root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search lxml
lxml-2.3-i486-1gv [inst=yes]: lxml (Powerful and Pythonic XML processing library)
html5lib-0.90-i486-1_SBo [inst=yes]: html5lib (HTML parser based on the HTML5 specification)
root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search python-lxml
root[vanilla]#

User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 5531
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray

Post by gapan » 31. Aug 2012, 07:44

mimosa wrote:... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current?
I don't understand, is this really a question? There is no lxml package that remains to be packaged for current. It's named python-lxml now and it's already there.
Image
Image

User avatar
mimosa
Salix Warrior
Posts: 3101
Joined: 25. May 2010, 17:02
Contact:

Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray

Post by mimosa » 31. Aug 2012, 10:29

I suppose the question was whether I was right to conclude that it *was* just a renaming (and not for instance a replacement). Sorry to be unclear.

Post Reply