Repository structure

Old stuff that should not bother anyone anymore
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: Repository structure

Post by thenktor » 16. Jun 2009, 10:28

gapan wrote:We should be a bit careful with the category dirs in the sources dir (although I like the idea a lot): if we move packages to another category in the package repo, they should also be moved in the sources repo.
Slackware does the same with it's source repo: http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackware-current/source/ And I think without categories it will get a real mess soon.


@ JRD: I really don't care about the "based on" text. If you like, you can wirite "based on 32 Bitburger beers" http://www.original-alkopedia.de/wiki/i ... emium_Pils :mrgreen:
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)

User avatar
JRD
Salix Warrior
Posts: 949
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 22:52
Location: Lyon, France

Re: Repository structure

Post by JRD » 16. Jun 2009, 10:35

Hum...I must taste this beer :) … If I find it !
Image

User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: Repository structure

Post by thenktor » 16. Jun 2009, 10:41

JRD wrote:Hum...I must taste this beer :) … If I find it !
It's some kind of running gag here in Germany. Their slogan is "Bitte ein Bit!" which means "Please give me a Bit!". But you won't miss anything if you take a look at my rating :)

Back to topic: Sure we should use good things from Zenwalk.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)

Locked