Include LVM in next release?

Other talk about Salix
Post Reply
User avatar
EricC
Posts: 79
Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 02:11
Location: Under an overpass in a shipping crate

Include LVM in next release?

Post by EricC »

Hi Guys,

Would it be possible to have LVM included in the installed packages by default with the next release? Device mapper is already installed so it would only be one item to add. Please :D

Thanks,
-Eric
Image
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by gapan »

OK :)
Image
Image
Shador
Posts: 1295
Joined: 11. Jun 2009, 14:04
Location: Bavaria

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by Shador »

cryptsetup-luks with it's static binary would enable encryption support. Together with LVM it's very easy to get a completely encrypted system with only one passphrase:
http://wiki.zenwalk.org/index.php?title ... KS_and_LVM
Image
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by gapan »

EricC wrote:Would it be possible to have LVM included in the installed packages by default with the next release? Device mapper is already installed so it would only be one item to add. Please :D
Just to let you know that if you need it urgently you can do it yourself! Just grab the iso, open it with isomaster, put the lvm package in the core directory and save to a new iso. ;)
Shador wrote:cryptsetup-luks with it's static binary would enable encryption support. Together with LVM it's very easy to get a completely encrypted system with only one passphrase:
http://wiki.zenwalk.org/index.php?title ... KS_and_LVM
But we don't have such a package in our repos. : ;)
Image
Image
User avatar
EricC
Posts: 79
Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 02:11
Location: Under an overpass in a shipping crate

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by EricC »

gapan wrote: Just to let you know that if you need it urgently you can do it yourself! Just grab the iso, open it with isomaster, put the lvm package in the core directory and save to a new iso. ;)
That is easy. :o Almost too easy :P I always thought something like that would invalidate the checksum of the ISO.
Image
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by gapan »

EricC wrote:I always thought something like that would invalidate the checksum of the ISO.
It will, but why should you care? You can get a new checksum with md5sum.
Image
Image
User avatar
EricC
Posts: 79
Joined: 24. Sep 2009, 02:11
Location: Under an overpass in a shipping crate

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by EricC »

gapan wrote:
EricC wrote:I always thought something like that would invalidate the checksum of the ISO.
It will, but why should you care? You can get a new checksum with md5sum.
Doh, ich bin ein dumkopf!
Image
Shador
Posts: 1295
Joined: 11. Jun 2009, 14:04
Location: Bavaria

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by Shador »

gapan wrote:
Shador wrote:cryptsetup-luks with it's static binary would enable encryption support. Together with LVM it's very easy to get a completely encrypted system with only one passphrase:
http://wiki.zenwalk.org/index.php?title ... KS_and_LVM
But we don't have such a package in our repos. : ;)
But slackware has. ;)
http://packages.slackware.it/search.php ... cryptsetup
Image
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by gapan »

I somehow thought that crypsetup-luks was a different package than that.
Image
Image
Shador
Posts: 1295
Joined: 11. Jun 2009, 14:04
Location: Bavaria

Re: Include LVM in next release?

Post by Shador »

gapan wrote:I somehow thought that crypsetup-luks was a different package than that.
Actually on Zenwalk cryptsetup-luks only installs cryptsetup as dep. :) So actually both provide the new luks version of cryptsetup.
There are also those 2 very complete and informative slackware readmes:
ftp://ftp.slackware.at/slackware-12.2/README_CRYPT.TXT
ftp://ftp.slackware.at/slackware-12.2/README_LVM.TXT
Image
Post Reply