lmello wrote:I feel like I'm the only person in the world who actually liked GNOME 3!
But my mother and a friend who never ever used Linux got their way in quite well so... YES, the removal of features and customization options is bullshit - they should ship GNOME 3 with gnome-tweak-tool, nautilus-actions (this solves GJones' example) and nautilus-open-terminal by default. A functional menu-editor should be developed also... but it's a
different desktop experience and that's the main reason I like it - it doesn't feel like a Windows clone like KDE does.
I don't think you're the only Gnome 3 fan; its release generated a lot of passionate debate in the Fedora forum. I read through most of those threads, and it seemed there was no middle ground; people either hated it or loved it (although the haters appeared to outnumber the fans). I remember some anecdotes that Gnome 3 was quickly liked/adopted by new Linux users -- as you observed firsthand -- and by younger folks who had been exposed to tablets.
I decided to try Fedora 17's implementation of Gnome 3 a couple of months ago, before I wrote it off completely. I was prepared to dislike it and in the beginning, it did indeed feel very "alien." I was fumbling around, lost ... But after installing the
gnome-tweak tool, the DE behaved more like the old Gnome 2. Gnome 3 has started to grow on me, and although I wouldn't say that I
love it or that it would be my first choice in DE, I like it. It does not deserve the bashing it has received. I think it's a similar situation to the first release(s) of KDE 4, which was soundly criticized and the developers were demonized. I was also ready to hate KDE 4, but gradually adapted to it.