Slackware 15
Re: Slackware 15
XFCE is the sanest desktop environment available currently. Runs equally good on older hardware. And no matter what people think or say, not everybody in the world uses computers with eight core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, RTX 3090 and 4K display. With a bit of a work, XFCE can be made to look as good as anything out there.
Re: Slackware 15
If the Forum had a "LIKE" button, I would like this one too.hakerdefo wrote: ↑6. Feb 2022, 21:18XFCE is the sanest desktop environment available currently. Runs equally good on older hardware. And no matter what people think or say, not everybody in the world uses computers with eight core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, RTX 3090 and 4K display. With a bit of a work, XFCE can be made to look as good as anything out there.
Re: Slackware 15
Thanks mateArtim wrote: ↑7. Feb 2022, 10:51If the Forum had a "LIKE" button, I would like this one too.hakerdefo wrote: ↑6. Feb 2022, 21:18XFCE is the sanest desktop environment available currently. Runs equally good on older hardware. And no matter what people think or say, not everybody in the world uses computers with eight core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, RTX 3090 and 4K display. With a bit of a work, XFCE can be made to look as good as anything out there.

BTW I really enjoyed the message of the latest post on your blog,
When IGNORANCE SCREAMS, intelligence moves on.
Re: Slackware 15
Hell, yes, XFCE has everything I will ever need and more, still being lightweight. I run XFCE in an ancient netbook with 1 Gb RAM, and in the past I actually did the same on a much older PC with even less RAM than that. Openbox is lighter, but Salix with XFCE runs just fine on pretty much any computer I tried. For several years I use Salix and Slackel (with XFCE and Openbox, respectively) on every computer I own, old or newer, and I never missed any "feature" other desktop environments "offer".hakerdefo wrote: ↑6. Feb 2022, 21:18XFCE is the sanest desktop environment available currently. Runs equally good on older hardware. And no matter what people think or say, not everybody in the world uses computers with eight core CPU, 32 GB of RAM, RTX 3090 and 4K display. With a bit of a work, XFCE can be made to look as good as anything out there.
You can easily make XFCE look more "modern", but in my opinion this just for people who want to want it to look like those resource-sinks like KDE or Gnome or even worse Window$... no, thank you.
A pleasant detail in this forum: several people pick a picture of their pet as their avatar. Who am I to do otherwise? 

Re: Slackware 15
@ Papasot I agree with you 100 % 

Re: Slackware 15
I think that is why even many distros intended for use by children - even very little children - base their interface on a modified Xfce desktop. And I think it follows the KISS principle (Slackware philosophy) more closely than the others too.
Re: Slackware 15
I'm a lazy slacker and will stay with 14.1 and 14.2 until they fail to operate. Xfce is crucial for me to continue with Linux on limited hardware, dual-core machines, 12 to 16 years old now. KDE has some good programs on board, but it's more efficent to use things like Kolourpaint, Gwenview and Kdenlive on a Xfce desktop. KDE as a desktop environment performs incredibly poorly on old hardware for what it has to offer.
Re: Slackware 15
A decent review... at least gives some attention to the Slackware project. But those who use slackware like me already know, that, as Jesse Smith wrote:
"things about using Slackware is that the underlying approach doesn't change. If you set up Slackware 20 years ago, the process is virtually the same today as it was then"
"things about using Slackware is that the underlying approach doesn't change. If you set up Slackware 20 years ago, the process is virtually the same today as it was then"
Re: Slackware 15
I posted the above link for a fruitful discussion and exchange of views because after so many years the slackware team does not integrate tools that make the user's life easier, such as the excellent salix tools so that after installation the user is in the graphical environment and can easily use the PC, without any impact on the stability and reliability of the slackware. The opposite would attract more users to the distribution. This is why derivatives distributions such as salix and others were created.
Of course everyone can have their point of view, all points of view are accepted and respected. Redhat 5.0 was my first linux installed on 1998. On 2000 I came in contact with slackware and facing all this and because I wanted to make my life easier I made the first slackel on 2004 or 2005, i don't remember exactly after so many years. And unfortunately after 20 years the situation has not been changed.
Of course everyone can have their point of view, all points of view are accepted and respected. Redhat 5.0 was my first linux installed on 1998. On 2000 I came in contact with slackware and facing all this and because I wanted to make my life easier I made the first slackel on 2004 or 2005, i don't remember exactly after so many years. And unfortunately after 20 years the situation has not been changed.