Sorry, but there's something terrible wrong here. You never should be getting such a weird partition layout. It should look just like the last extract ('Salix fresh'). Whatever 'Salix fresh' should mean. I don't know of tinycore of course.Atip wrote:Code: Select all
Salix Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1p1 ? 3223366781 3470046704 123339962 78 Unknown /dev/sdc1p2 ? 432871117 1208554935 387841909+ 10 OPUS /dev/sdc1p3 ? 1869562563 3788792630 959615034 8b Unknown /dev/sdc1p4 ? 3762290688 3770613779 4161546 a OS/2 Boot Manager TC Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1p1 ? 3224498923 3657370039 216435558+ 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sdc1p2 ? 3272020941 930513678 976730017 16 Hidden FAT16 /dev/sdc1p3 ? 0 0 0 6f Unknown /dev/sdc1p4 50200576 974536369 462167897 0 Empty Salix fresh Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1p1 * 2048 7975239 3986596 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
Apart from that you're getting weird disk names. I've never seen that device naming with normal block devices (usually they're /dev/sdc1 instead of /dev/sdc1p1). What distribution is this? These uncommon names almost certainly cause trouble.
Regarding the names, this version is possibly more reliable: http://gaia.homelinux.org/misc/install-on-USB.sh
But some more information would be nice nevertheless.