578 Upgrades? [solved]

You have a problem with Salix? Post here and we'll do what we can to help.
jcoleman
Posts: 38
Joined: 9. Feb 2011, 21:54
Location: Dolores County, Colorado

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by jcoleman »

@laprjns - couldn't do anything - no keyboard response - no "typee" at all

@JRD - we all have our "duh" moments,

---like I tried to reinstall off the USB stick, but this bios gets cranky at times, sometimes it works sometimes not, doesn't seem to matter whether I use unetbootin or "dd". My other puters work fine with the USB stick. Soooo, I booted into a Puppy CD and did the USB stick again, still wouldn't boot; me being cheap I didn't want to burn a DVD but did, EXCEPT I burned it with the Slackware64.iso, "thought the install screens were different" - I'll wake up here sometime
User avatar
fredg
Posts: 232
Joined: 3. Oct 2009, 16:50
Location: Lyon, France
Contact:

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by fredg »

Only those who do nothing are never wrong ;)

++
User avatar
witek
Posts: 233
Joined: 16. Nov 2009, 13:41
Location: Poland.Łódź

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by witek »

I have another upgrade problem:

Code: Select all

Upgrading package distribute-0.6.28-i486-1fg -> distribute-0.6.32-i486-1fg...
| distribute (Easily build and distribute Python packages)
| 
| Distribute is a fork of the Setuptools project. Distribute is intended
| to replace Setuptools as the standard method for working with Python
| module distributions.
| Providing a backward compatible version to replace Setuptools and make
| all distributions that depend on Setuptools work as before, but with
| less bugs and behaviorial issues.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
ERROR: Can't create file over existing directory. (usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg-info)
ERROR: Failed to extract file usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg-info.
ERROR: Package upgrade failed!
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by gapan »

fredg wrote:Only those who do nothing are never wrong ;)

++
That's exactly what you should do in a stable repository: nothing.

Nothing other than what's absolutely necessary and once more it seems that we have broken that rule and once more that has gotten us into trouble. The repositories are not a playground.
Image
Image
User avatar
JRD
Salix Warrior
Posts: 950
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 22:52
Location: Lyon, France

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by JRD »

About "distribute", I don't know. It's not related to the problem earlier.
Image
User avatar
fredg
Posts: 232
Joined: 3. Oct 2009, 16:50
Location: Lyon, France
Contact:

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by fredg »

That's exactly what you should do in a stable repository: nothing.
I think the trouble is that it is stable only for the Xfce release, so we will have to "play" with it again.
The release was maybe a little bit too quick.
Nothing other than what's absolutely necessary and once more it seems that we have broken that rule and once more that has gotten us into trouble. The repositories are not a playground.
I don't think that JRD was playing and having fun making some crap, and BTW, it is his own server.
He knows what he has done wrong and already apologized, no need to publicly yell at him.
Everybody can make a mistake, I'm sure that even you, can make one, no ? ;)

Best regards.

++
User avatar
witek
Posts: 233
Joined: 16. Nov 2009, 13:41
Location: Poland.Łódź

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by witek »

JRD wrote:About "distribute", I don't know. It's not related to the problem earlier.
Seems to be a problem with slapt-get as when I manually removed this packages then manually installed it from slapt cache with installpkg it worked.
User avatar
JRD
Salix Warrior
Posts: 950
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 22:52
Location: Lyon, France

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by JRD »

A problem with spkg then, not with slapt-get.
Image
User avatar
witek
Posts: 233
Joined: 16. Nov 2009, 13:41
Location: Poland.Łódź

Re: 578 Upgrades? [solved]

Post by witek »

fredg wrote: He knows what he has done wrong and already apologized, no need to publicly yell at him.
Tell this to Linus :shock:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75
Post Reply