x86_64

Old stuff that should not bother anyone anymore
User avatar
Akuna
Salix Wizard
Posts: 1038
Joined: 14. Jun 2009, 12:25

Re: x86_64

Post by Akuna »

.:B:. wrote:(I don't know how many people you know that run stuff predating the i686 era Pierrick?).
Indeed, PII onward is just fine, with isa support, as in Slackware kernel.

In other words, we are fine just like it is right now in Slackware current.
Image
What really matters is where you are going, not where you come from.
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: x86_64

Post by thenktor »

i686 is fine for me, but George want's to use his old Pentium machine with our distribution :P
For pre i686 there are special distributions, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeLi_Linux
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
User avatar
JRD
Salix Warrior
Posts: 950
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 22:52
Location: Lyon, France

Re: x86_64

Post by JRD »

You mean i486 in you last sentence, don't you ?
Image
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: x86_64

Post by thenktor »

JRD wrote:You mean i486 in you last sentence, don't you ?
"pre i686" ;) everything older than i686.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
.:B:.
Posts: 34
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 16:58

Re: x86_64

Post by .:B:. »

thenktor wrote:
.:B:. wrote: I think it might be a good idea to put ISA support back in your kernel.
Tell me some boards for P2 or P3 with ISA slots :P ISA is really outdated for desktop computers nowadays. If you want to use such old stuff you should consider a distribution, that is made for this task. ;)
ISA slots may be absent, ISA is still present in some form on modern motherboards, if I am not mistaken.
User avatar
JRD
Salix Warrior
Posts: 950
Joined: 7. Jun 2009, 22:52
Location: Lyon, France

Re: x86_64

Post by JRD »

mmm, we need to have real examples...
Image
Locked