Page 2 of 2
Re: BCM4312 Wireless Problems
Posted: 15. Aug 2010, 15:49
by lmello
This !@$% card is problematic. Every kernel release and you'll have to try a different method to get it working:
In Slackware 12.2 I used ndiswrapper.
In Slackware 13.0 I used the tarball provided at Broadcom's website.
In Slackware 13.1 I used the b43-firmware and b43-fwcutter packages from SBo.
Thankfully, the box I run Salix on has an atheros-compatible wireless card.
Re: BCM4312 Wireless Problems
Posted: 15. Aug 2010, 21:12
by caitlyn
In all three Slackware releases I was able to use the driver on the Broadcom website. I used the slackbuild script from SBo to create the package in each case. It's been 100% consistently solid for me with the STA driver from the Broadcom site, at least with the revision I have in this machine and the one I had in a crappy Gateway laptop which died prematurely. That's why I recommend sticking with the STA driver, at least for now.
Yes, the Atheros 5xxx chipsets are very well supported now. A few years ago you had to use madwifi or ndiswrapper and they were problematic too.

Thankfully that is no longer the case.
Re: BCM4312 Wireless Problems
Posted: 15. Aug 2010, 21:15
by caitlyn
sqlpython wrote:I'm sorry but I did try b43 first. It absolutely, positively does not work with my hardware which is a BCM 4312 chipset.
I also have been connecting my 4312 via the b43 for quite some time, at least since 2.6.32. No, I checked actually before that kernel. As christian had mentioned perhaps you have a particular hardware version quirk.
and BTW my 4312 won't work with STA.... go figure..
I don't think it's a quirk. Broadcom is notorious for changing things without changing model numbers. Their hba cards for SAN connections have also had similar issues. It's just the way Broadcom is.
Re: BCM4312 Wireless Problems
Posted: 17. Aug 2010, 03:20
by sqlpython
I don't think it's a quirk. Broadcom is notorious for changing things without changing model numbers
Yep, quite likely. Broadcom shares very little info.