Salix Forums

autogestion wrote:because of the contrary Slackware would continue being elitist

What do you mean by that? (that is the only thing I did not understood).

thenktor wrote:

Akuna wrote:But I tend to be uneasy with any kind of easy 'name' bashing.

It's not name bashing. It's just the fact that we do things in a completly different way than Ubuntu and even Debian does. And I love the Slackware/Salix way and don't like the Debian/Ubuntu way. That's the reason I don't want to be compared to Ubuntu.

I do agree with you, but perhaps the original question would be better put as this: "do you think Salix is to Slackware what Ubuntu is to Debian?"

Actually, I think Salix's "user-friendliness" and GUI configuration tools are good enough to describe it as an "Ubuntu that works."

zAchAry wrote:

autogestion wrote:because of the contrary Slackware would continue being elitist

What do you mean by that? (that is the only thing I did not understood).

I think autogestion is trying to say that SalixOS makes Slackware easier for mere mortals instead of just l33t g33ks .

autogestion wrote:]I wanted to say the same, but I thing that a Salix OS based distro with some really snobbish stuff should be named "The ubuntu of Slackware".

VectorLInux fits the bill more that SalixOS does. It has a GUI installer (not just on the live CD) and does more to make the experience newbie friendly. Of course, they don't have a 64-bit build yet and SalixOS does.

Is that a Salix Ubuntized or a Salix Gnomized?

For me the only question makes me shiver ...

I conceive Salix OS as a set of useful things to make up for other deficiencies of the mother and not as a distribution UBUNTUIZED

only imagine the kind of appearance is horrible

seacat wrote: Is that a Salix Ubuntized or a Salix Gnomized?

No, it's (Salix 13.1.1) Xfce (Ubuntized).

Icon set:
GNOME-Human

Xfwm theme:
Moheli

GTK+2 theme: (click here for the gtkrc file)
Human (default of Ubuntu 8.10)

Background: (you can find it here too)
From Ubuntu 8.10

I don't see any comparrison between the 2 slackware, is based on a solid core that has stood the test of time and legendary stability. ubuntu is based on a unstable core and alpha/beta software, All Salix has done is take the grandaddy of Linux and given him some nice tools and a new coat. the old dog just lost his way thats all.

Ubuntu is some kind of SalixOS with obesitas? Even Lubuntu feels that way.

No Offence.