Page 1 of 1
Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . [SOLVED]
Posted: 6. Sep 2010, 13:31
by SalmonEater
Using Salix_13.1-LXDE, I went through the process outlined in
http://www.salixos.org/wiki/index.php/H ... cy_support (doing better than I did last time, with 13.1.1-XFCE), but on
, I received the error in the Subject line.
Does using
http://salix.enialis.net/i486/slackware-13.1/ make a difference over . . . slackware-13.0 ? (Wiki seems like it needs to be updated). Did I miss something?
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 6. Sep 2010, 15:56
by gapan
If you also have duplicated the GPG-KEY file from the repository, just run slapt-get --add-keys.
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 6. Sep 2010, 22:54
by SalmonEater
slapt-get --add-keys => "Retrieving GPG key [ --- ] . . . Not Found"
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 6. Sep 2010, 22:55
by gapan
gapan wrote:If you also have duplicated the GPG-KEY file from the repository, just run slapt-get --add-keys.
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 7. Sep 2010, 16:04
by SalmonEater
Did duplicate it, put it in local repo.
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 7. Sep 2010, 16:35
by gapan
Can you please post the output of ls in your local repo directory?
Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified
Posted: 7. Sep 2010, 20:46
by SalmonEater
Forget it for now, gapan -- I'm going to download the new salix-13.1.1-lxde and work with that -- thanks.
Got the salix-13.1.1-xfce local repo functioning fine, however, after a try or two.
Learning slackware&salix is like learning DOS for the first time -- time-consuming, but rewarding. Thanks to all.