Page 1 of 1
JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 29. Jun 2012, 16:44
by macondo
What's the verdict on JFS and Ext4? thanks...
Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 29. Jun 2012, 21:19
by mlmyers
One is not better than the other for all tasks. Each has advantages and disadvantages. What do you plan to do with your computer? For general home use, I see no reason not to stick with the default ext4. This review covers several use cases, but it is a little out of date.
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388
Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 30. Jun 2012, 12:33
by macondo
Ext4 has given me problems with the mouse, not XFS nor JFS.
Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 30. Jun 2012, 12:54
by gapan
macondo wrote:Ext4 has given me problems with the mouse, not XFS nor JFS.
That's only because you need to change the oil pump in your car. Duh...
Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 30. Jun 2012, 17:12
by Shador
No, gapan, I think your wrong. It looks more like being caused by a butterfly in Sidney.

Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 30. Jun 2012, 21:11
by mimosa
There have been some bad cases of rat poisoning in Brazil recently

Re: JFS vs Ext4?
Posted: 17. Jul 2012, 03:50
by GJones
JFS uses extremely aggressive caching, and is guaranteed to eat your data. Ext4, in my experience, is fairly stable. Use Ext4.