Page 1 of 1
lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 29. Aug 2012, 13:34
by mimosa
As suggested in the chatroom, this is to say that I'm working on these two packages. Not that they're very complicated, but there are a few things to doublecheck.
I can't package for 64 bits at the moment, but I'm expecting to take delivery of a 64-bit motherboard on Friday or early next week, so soon I will be able to
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 29. Aug 2012, 15:27
by fredg
Yes, good idea.
I have added the [WIP] tag (Work In Progress) for a better visualization, just remove it when it's done
++
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 30. Aug 2012, 07:32
by gapan
Uhm...
Mon Jul 30 2012
l/python-lxml-2.3.4-i486-1gv.txz: Added.
This is an upgrade to the lxml package in 13.37.
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 30. Aug 2012, 08:59
by mimosa
Oh dear. This is a problem with names:
Code: Select all
vanilla[bin]$ ./pkgdepcheck.py
Please enter name of package: lxml
The package lxml is present in stable but has not been packaged for current yet.
Its dependencies are
libgcrypt libgpg-error libxml2 libxslt python zlib
We will now check whether any of these deps remain unpackaged in current.
The following packages are missing:
lxml
Please enter name of package: python-lxml
The package python-lxml has already been packaged for current.
... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current? This is slapt-get in 13.37:
Code: Select all
root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search lxml
lxml-2.3-i486-1gv [inst=yes]: lxml (Powerful and Pythonic XML processing library)
html5lib-0.90-i486-1_SBo [inst=yes]: html5lib (HTML parser based on the HTML5 specification)
root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search python-lxml
root[vanilla]#
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 31. Aug 2012, 07:44
by gapan
mimosa wrote:... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current?
I don't understand, is this really a question? There is no lxml package that remains to be packaged for current. It's named python-lxml now and it's already there.
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Posted: 31. Aug 2012, 10:29
by mimosa
I suppose the question was whether I was right to conclude that it *was* just a renaming (and not for instance a replacement). Sorry to be unclear.