SalixOS Speed
Posted: 17. Feb 2016, 12:57
Greetings. I am not sure where to post this message. Pardon if this one is misplaced.
To *gapan* and the respectable SalixTeam:
Gentlemen, sirs,
I am a salix OS user since it came into being somewhere Slackware 13 (might be wrong but it was that time I first came to know/use your admirable flavor). I have created a userID in this forum (that time), posted twice (maybe) but never had enough time here, I mostly stayed at linuxquestionDOTorg in a different name.
Your Slackware flavor is superb, from criteria of speed on a desktop SalixOS is far above other derivatives. This statement bears a heavy amount of my gratitude to you and to the team by whose efforts this OS exists ---so much that a simple "Thank You" cannot be near enough to do justice. I owe you. I thank you.
I tried many distros. But for sanity and taste today all my systems run only on Salix and BSD. Why Salix and not Slackware release? well the answer is the very reason why you (and team) created salixOS out of that respectable distribution: Speed and Simplicity on a desktop, that perfectly match the the slim XFCE.
But, Linux kernel is now bloated and is getting fat for almost every version release. Try run Slackware 8 and 14 on same machine, all other things equal the current kernel groans. This is happening too among *BSD. I begin to worry what will happen when time comes speed is compromised where/if the hardware is not upgraded (at cost). Most users evidently buy machine hoping to run it *forever*; we don't spend money for something we only trash after two years. But here we see /* I mean, I saw and I see */ the magic of Salix. For those like me who don't seek for fats and lipstick Salix has offered more than what I expected when Slackware began dragging at version 12. A bonzai is not merely a product of great care but it edifies us what health the beauty of the tree brings to both our body and mind.
I am an old man and slack at configuring my own kernel. My computing skill is limited, I can only do little bash, though I have a workable understanding of what the system or network is doing. I am not a developer, although I was computing since MSDOS v. 1 and Windows 3.11. I belong to the generation that spends sleepless nights behind cathode box, tinkering scripts and dial-up phone line connections to manipulate my neighbors fax and machines.
Today we have Slackware GNU/Linux. Slackware is a great philosophy and as honorable as the great Pat V. But my sweetest romance with Slackware is when I run my Salix, because this singular distro has remained faithful to the great honor by which Slackware was glorified to the throne: the virtues of speed, stability and simplicity. If Linux kernel becomes obese and Slackware should in the future become Slackware GNU/Minix I shall be there. Meantime, I will only use Salix when running Linux.
My Question:
a) How did you tune Slackware kernel to gain such a speed yet available to many hardware?
b) What build configuration file used, and is it available for me to copy, modify and use for my own?
Thanks ahead.
May the SalixOS team grow stronger.
Alberto
To *gapan* and the respectable SalixTeam:
Gentlemen, sirs,
I am a salix OS user since it came into being somewhere Slackware 13 (might be wrong but it was that time I first came to know/use your admirable flavor). I have created a userID in this forum (that time), posted twice (maybe) but never had enough time here, I mostly stayed at linuxquestionDOTorg in a different name.
Your Slackware flavor is superb, from criteria of speed on a desktop SalixOS is far above other derivatives. This statement bears a heavy amount of my gratitude to you and to the team by whose efforts this OS exists ---so much that a simple "Thank You" cannot be near enough to do justice. I owe you. I thank you.
I tried many distros. But for sanity and taste today all my systems run only on Salix and BSD. Why Salix and not Slackware release? well the answer is the very reason why you (and team) created salixOS out of that respectable distribution: Speed and Simplicity on a desktop, that perfectly match the the slim XFCE.
But, Linux kernel is now bloated and is getting fat for almost every version release. Try run Slackware 8 and 14 on same machine, all other things equal the current kernel groans. This is happening too among *BSD. I begin to worry what will happen when time comes speed is compromised where/if the hardware is not upgraded (at cost). Most users evidently buy machine hoping to run it *forever*; we don't spend money for something we only trash after two years. But here we see /* I mean, I saw and I see */ the magic of Salix. For those like me who don't seek for fats and lipstick Salix has offered more than what I expected when Slackware began dragging at version 12. A bonzai is not merely a product of great care but it edifies us what health the beauty of the tree brings to both our body and mind.
I am an old man and slack at configuring my own kernel. My computing skill is limited, I can only do little bash, though I have a workable understanding of what the system or network is doing. I am not a developer, although I was computing since MSDOS v. 1 and Windows 3.11. I belong to the generation that spends sleepless nights behind cathode box, tinkering scripts and dial-up phone line connections to manipulate my neighbors fax and machines.
Today we have Slackware GNU/Linux. Slackware is a great philosophy and as honorable as the great Pat V. But my sweetest romance with Slackware is when I run my Salix, because this singular distro has remained faithful to the great honor by which Slackware was glorified to the throne: the virtues of speed, stability and simplicity. If Linux kernel becomes obese and Slackware should in the future become Slackware GNU/Minix I shall be there. Meantime, I will only use Salix when running Linux.
My Question:
a) How did you tune Slackware kernel to gain such a speed yet available to many hardware?
b) What build configuration file used, and is it available for me to copy, modify and use for my own?
Thanks ahead.
May the SalixOS team grow stronger.
Alberto