Page 3 of 4
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 23. Aug 2022, 21:36
by hugok
@gapan Can you update the Portuguese/Portuguese(Portugal) translation of salix-installer again? A typo was corrected since the last update.
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 23. Aug 2022, 21:43
by hugok
There will be an Live edition for this release?
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 24. Aug 2022, 07:34
by Artim
There MUST be a Live option. Some of us won't install it only to find out afterwards if there's a problem. Live is certainly the way to go.
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 24. Aug 2022, 10:11
by linuxo
Hi,
I can't see Salix OS on Distrowatch, and it's RC3 already.
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 24. Aug 2022, 20:45
by hugok
Salix is there
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=salix and in the last few days it has risen a lot in the Distrowatch ranking but Distrowatch only shows the fisrt 100 "distros" of the last
6 months by default. Currently, Salix is at 102 position on the distrowatch popularity! Mostly due to the fact that salix was in a "dormant" state for a long time... which was never the case but anyway... Distrowatch ranking is worth what it's worth...
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 25. Aug 2022, 18:40
by SalixManiac
the classification by Average visitor rating is more realistic than the classification by curiosity,
Absolute___Average visitor rating: 4.6/10
Ubuntu____Average visitor rating: 7.61/10
Mageia____Average visitor rating: 8.43/10
openSUSE_Average visitor rating: 8.89/10
Slackware__Average visitor rating: 9.05/10
Salix_______Average visitor rating: 9.22/10
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 28. Aug 2022, 11:23
by babam
Does
ibus need
gtk+2 and
pango?
I think it's weird if there is a program that requires both gtk+2 and gtk+3
Code: Select all
PACKAGE NAME: ibus-1.5.25-x86_64-5.txz
PACKAGE LOCATION: ./slackware64/x
PACKAGE SIZE (compressed): 7548 K
PACKAGE SIZE (uncompressed): 73190 K
PACKAGE REQUIRED: aaa_libraries|bzip2,aaa_libraries|glib2,aaa_libraries|libcap,aaa_libraries|libffi,aaa_libraries|libjpeg-turbo,aaa_libraries|libpng,aaa_libraries|pcre,aaa_libraries|xz,aaa_libraries|zlib,at-spi2-atk,at-spi2-core,atk,brotli,cairo,dbus,dconf,elogind,fontconfig,freetype,fribidi,gdk-pixbuf2,glib2,graphite2,gtk+2,gtk+3,harfbuzz,libX11,libXau,libXcomposite,libXcursor,libXdamage,libXdmcp,libXext,libXfixes,libXi,libXinerama,libXrandr,libXrender,libepoxy,libglvnd,libxcb,libxkbcommon,libxml2,pango,pixman,util-linux,wayland
Thanks.
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 28. Aug 2022, 22:32
by gapan
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 28. Aug 2022, 22:33
by gapan
mimosa wrote: ↑20. Aug 2022, 18:52
EDIT scrub this, the reason is I set up my local repo, but it doesn't have any packages in it yet; so slapt-get is unhappy with that line in slapt-getrc
Yes, slapt-get is not happy with empty repos. Same with slapt-src.
Re: Salix 15.0RC3
Posted: 28. Aug 2022, 22:40
by gapan
babam wrote: ↑28. Aug 2022, 11:23
Does
ibus need
gtk+2 and
pango?
I think it's weird if there is a program that requires both gtk+2 and gtk+3
Yes, it does... sort of. The ibus package includes a library (plugin) that is loaded for supporting gtk+2 applications. That library needs gtk+2 and that's why it got picked up. But then again, if you don't have gtk+2 installed at all, the plugin is useless and it doesn't matter if it works or not as it wouldn't ever be loaded. So, I removed the dependency for gtk+2. Thanks!