Thinking a bit more about it:
In SalixOS you can be bashed by a big German friendly looking guy with long hairs, without being actually being hurt.
In SalixOS an answer can just be "no".
Salix: The ubuntu of Slackware?
Re: Salix: The ubuntu of Slackware?
What is all that supposed to mean?lighans wrote:Thinking a bit more about it:
In SalixOS you can be bashed by a big German friendly looking guy with long hairs, without being actually being hurt.
In SalixOS an answer can just be "no".
Re: Salix: The ubuntu of Slackware?
For my meek part, I would fully sign the following comment. Each distribution has its reason and rights to be there.
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/a ... -Users.htm
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/a ... -Users.htm
Matt Hartley wrote: Not enough Ubuntu users appear to realize that not every distribution of Linux out there is doing things the "Ubuntu way" with regard to buggy releases and a need to look like OS X, among other issues. Many other Linux distributions out there have varying release schedules and some Linux distributions even wait until their releases are stable before releasing them. Clearly a bold move, as much of Ubuntu's success might be attributed to the "release no matter what mentality" we see these days.
"Besides, I think Slackware sounds better than 'Microsoft,' don't you?" (By Patrick Volkerding)
Re: Salix: The ubuntu of Slackware?
Meant to be funny. Sorry if it offended you.gapan wrote: What is all that supposed to mean?
Every distro has his atmosphere in the community. Also that makes distros hard to compare.
Re: Salix: The ubuntu of Slackware?
OK, no problem. A smiley in there would have helped I guess.lighans wrote:Meant to be funny. Sorry if it offended you.
Every distro has his atmosphere in the community. Also that makes distros hard to compare.