The means overcome the end

If you have any suggestions or ideas about improving Salix, here's the place to post them.
cjtron
Posts: 32
Joined: 7. May 2011, 02:28

The means overcome the end

Post by cjtron »

could you possibly do 3 things,,,

1, why not install midori by default instead of firefox ,,,,
2. divx browser playback?
3 13.37 lxde/openbox/fluxbox versions plz..

Lastly, could you default the font rendering better quality by default ..... please :mrgreen:
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by thenktor »

cjtron wrote:could you possibly do 3 things,,,

1, why not install midori by default instead of firefox ,,,,
2. divx browser playback?
3 13.37 lxde/openbox/fluxbox versions plz..

Lastly, could you default the font rendering better quality by default ..... please :mrgreen:
1. Most people prefer Firefox.
2. This requires another media player (Totem, VLC) and IMHO most time it sucks anyway.
3. Will be released in the future. Until then: slapt-get -i openbox :P

My font rendering is great.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
cjtron
Posts: 32
Joined: 7. May 2011, 02:28

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by cjtron »

Ok, I agree, except the font rendering...

Its not so great... vs ubuntu's
as said before..

Dont take it the wrong way...

But I love salix ! Thanx for also the help, always delivered :)
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by thenktor »

cjtron wrote: Its not so great... vs ubuntu's
as said before..
We had another thread about it. Maybe I don't use the standard settings, but at least on my KDE system the rendering is superb :)
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
User avatar
mimosa
Salix Warrior
Posts: 3311
Joined: 25. May 2010, 17:02
Contact:

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by mimosa »

font rendering
Yes, it's really puzzling that a few people (well, two so far who've mentioned it, I think) have a problem with this. Most users appear to find the quality excellent. Could it be something to do with screen type or size? Mine are middling-to-large Samsung LCDs. When I installed Arch (with Gnome) the quality (font rendering) was so bad I never used it much, even after all the hours of tinkering it had taken :evil: , so I certainly sympathise.

Or maybe the video card?
User avatar
Arael
Posts: 40
Joined: 2. Apr 2010, 19:24

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by Arael »

mimosa wrote: Or maybe the video card?
I don't think it is the video card. My guess is that KDE (and perhaps XFCE too) has his own ways to improve the sharpness of the fonts. Those of you that are using KDE should try to start just a window manager and see if there are differences. I'm using openbox as a matter of fact.

I had to recompile some packages and had to apply ubuntu patches to obtain a decent font sharpness. I got the paches for the AUR. I must admit that the default font rendering is not good. At least not as good as it is on other distributions I used. I always had this problem with Slackware and mostly this is due to the Patrick's decision to not infringe patents. Nowadays some of these patents have expired so enabling then by default wouldn't be such a bad idea. Just my two cents. I don't mind recompiling a couple of packages.
Image
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by thenktor »

I have to admit that fonts in dolphin really look a bit better than in thunar or pcmanfm. I'm not sure about my Firefox in Openbox. It seems to have the same look like dolphin and I'm sure it's much better than Firefox on OpenSuse 11.2 that I'm using at work.

EDIT: I'm using the Dejavu fonts in Firefox.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
User avatar
gatewayasteroid
Posts: 54
Joined: 9. Dec 2009, 14:30
Location: Milano, Italy, EU

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by gatewayasteroid »

thenktor wrote:
cjtron wrote: Its not so great... vs ubuntu's
as said before..
We had another thread about it. Maybe I don't use the standard settings, but at least on my KDE system the rendering is superb :)
Yes, KDE and QT apps have great font quality. But not GTK ones :(
Antid Oto
Posts: 57
Joined: 6. Jul 2010, 01:28
Location: Bs. As. - Argentina.

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by Antid Oto »

To solve the little problem with the fonts (in GTK environment), simply look at the file "CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT" from Slackware. The solution offered is:
The (formerly) patented bytecode interpreter is now enabled in the freetype
package, so your fonts might look a bit different. If this is undesirable,
you can restore the previous default with this line:
# ln -s ../conf.avail/10-autohint.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/
I hope you work the tip. ;)
Image
User avatar
gatewayasteroid
Posts: 54
Joined: 9. Dec 2009, 14:30
Location: Milano, Italy, EU

Re: The means overcome the end

Post by gatewayasteroid »

Antid Oto wrote:To solve the little problem with the fonts (in GTK environment), simply look at the file "CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT" from Slackware. The solution offered is:
The (formerly) patented bytecode interpreter is now enabled in the freetype
package, so your fonts might look a bit different. If this is undesirable,
you can restore the previous default with this line:
# ln -s ../conf.avail/10-autohint.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/
I hope you work the tip. ;)
I already did it in a similar way, with my ~/.fonts.conf

Code: Select all

<edit mode="assign" name="autohint"><bool>true</bool></edit> <!-- Autohinter -->
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting"><bool>false</bool></edit> <!-- Byte-Code -->
with no luck.

Ubuntu and other distros apply some patches to cairo as far as I understood. That's the key.
Post Reply