I can't package for 64 bits at the moment, but I'm expecting to take delivery of a 64-bit motherboard on Friday or early next week, so soon I will be able to
lxml and stalonetray
lxml and stalonetray
As suggested in the chatroom, this is to say that I'm working on these two packages. Not that they're very complicated, but there are a few things to doublecheck.
I can't package for 64 bits at the moment, but I'm expecting to take delivery of a 64-bit motherboard on Friday or early next week, so soon I will be able to
I can't package for 64 bits at the moment, but I'm expecting to take delivery of a 64-bit motherboard on Friday or early next week, so soon I will be able to
Last edited by mimosa on 16. Sep 2012, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Yes, good idea.
I have added the [WIP] tag (Work In Progress) for a better visualization, just remove it when it's done
++
I have added the [WIP] tag (Work In Progress) for a better visualization, just remove it when it's done
++
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Uhm...
Mon Jul 30 2012
l/python-lxml-2.3.4-i486-1gv.txz: Added.
This is an upgrade to the lxml package in 13.37.
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
Oh dear. This is a problem with names:
... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current? This is slapt-get in 13.37:
Code: Select all
vanilla[bin]$ ./pkgdepcheck.py
Please enter name of package: lxml
The package lxml is present in stable but has not been packaged for current yet.
Its dependencies are
libgcrypt libgpg-error libxml2 libxslt python zlib
We will now check whether any of these deps remain unpackaged in current.
The following packages are missing:
lxml
Please enter name of package: python-lxml
The package python-lxml has already been packaged for current.Code: Select all
root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search lxml
lxml-2.3-i486-1gv [inst=yes]: lxml (Powerful and Pythonic XML processing library)
html5lib-0.90-i486-1_SBo [inst=yes]: html5lib (HTML parser based on the HTML5 specification)
root[vanilla]# slapt-get --search python-lxml
root[vanilla]#Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
I don't understand, is this really a question? There is no lxml package that remains to be packaged for current. It's named python-lxml now and it's already there.mimosa wrote:... so I wonder what is this package "lxml" that's present in 13.37 but remains to be packaged for current?
Re: [WIP] lxml and stalonetray
I suppose the question was whether I was right to conclude that it *was* just a renaming (and not for instance a replacement). Sorry to be unclear.


