Useless Gmail Video Chat

Introduce yourself, create test postings or talk nonsense
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by thenktor »

Someone should write a SLKBUILD an post it to the "Contributed packages" section. Should be fine enough.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by gapan »

thenktor wrote:Someone should write a SLKBUILD an post it to the "Contributed packages" section. Should be fine enough.
The slackbuild that is linked in the first post is fine enough for that matter.
Image
Image
User avatar
thenktor
Salix Wizard
Posts: 2426
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 14:47
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by thenktor »

Indeed, I've missed that one.
Image
burnCDDA (burns audio CDs)
geBIERt (German beer blog)
User avatar
ray
Posts: 87
Joined: 20. Mar 2010, 10:28
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by ray »

gapan wrote:There is a thread in this forum about pidgin with video/audio support. Search for it. I find it very unstable and slackware is right for not including support for it by default.

Also, there is no chance this will be included in the repos.
Fair enough about the pidgin package.
But, may i ask why it wont be included in the repos? Is it due to the licensing conditions, as posted by damNageHack?
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6241
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by gapan »

ray wrote:But, may i ask why it wont be included in the repos? Is it due to the licensing conditions, as posted by damNageHack?
Of course.
Image
Image
User avatar
ray
Posts: 87
Joined: 20. Mar 2010, 10:28
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Useless Gmail Video Chat

Post by ray »

gapan wrote:
ray wrote:But, may i ask why it wont be included in the repos? Is it due to the licensing conditions, as posted by damNageHack?
Of course.
Fair enough then. :)
Post Reply