Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . [SOLVED]

You have a problem with Salix? Post here and we'll do what we can to help.
Post Reply
User avatar
SalmonEater
Posts: 35
Joined: 8. Jun 2010, 22:46
Location: Inland Pacific NW

Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . [SOLVED]

Post by SalmonEater »

Using Salix_13.1-LXDE, I went through the process outlined in http://www.salixos.org/wiki/index.php/H ... cy_support (doing better than I did last time, with 13.1.1-XFCE), but on

Code: Select all

slapt-get -u
, I received the error in the Subject line.

Does using http://salix.enialis.net/i486/slackware-13.1/ make a difference over . . . slackware-13.0 ? (Wiki seems like it needs to be updated). Did I miss something?
Last edited by SalmonEater on 9. Sep 2010, 17:51, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6361
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by gapan »

If you also have duplicated the GPG-KEY file from the repository, just run slapt-get --add-keys.
Image
Image
User avatar
SalmonEater
Posts: 35
Joined: 8. Jun 2010, 22:46
Location: Inland Pacific NW

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by SalmonEater »

slapt-get --add-keys => "Retrieving GPG key [ --- ] . . . Not Found"
" . . . only when the last fish is caught will these people realize they cannot eat money." -- Cree proverb
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6361
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by gapan »

gapan wrote:If you also have duplicated the GPG-KEY file from the repository, just run slapt-get --add-keys.
Image
Image
User avatar
SalmonEater
Posts: 35
Joined: 8. Jun 2010, 22:46
Location: Inland Pacific NW

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by SalmonEater »

Did duplicate it, put it in local repo.
User avatar
gapan
Salix Wizard
Posts: 6361
Joined: 6. Jun 2009, 17:40

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by gapan »

Can you please post the output of ls in your local repo directory?
Image
Image
User avatar
SalmonEater
Posts: 35
Joined: 8. Jun 2010, 22:46
Location: Inland Pacific NW

Re: Verifying checksum signature [ --- ] . . . Not Verified

Post by SalmonEater »

Forget it for now, gapan -- I'm going to download the new salix-13.1.1-lxde and work with that -- thanks.
Got the salix-13.1.1-xfce local repo functioning fine, however, after a try or two.

Learning slackware&salix is like learning DOS for the first time -- time-consuming, but rewarding. Thanks to all.
Post Reply